GTM teams are highly autonomous and technical, working directly with strategic enterprise customers, and building first product versions
Feedback and deployment learnings live in multiple threads/tools, making it difficult for Product to consolidate and identify patterns for future roadmapping
Our Goal
Design a lightweight feedback loop that captures rich qualitative insights from the field and routes them to Product and Engineering promptly for visibility and action.
Design Principles
Qualitative Over Quantitative
With few large strategic customers, rich insights from the right customer matter more than volume metrics (for now)
Feedback is Actionable
Capture not just "what" customers are requesting, but "why" it matters, "how" they'd use it, and "who" needs it. This makes feedback actionable for Product and Engineering teams
Start Lightweight
Pilot a simple workflow with easy submission mechanisms, then increase complexity over time based on learnings
The Proposal
Notion as Single Source of Truth
We'll create a centralized Notion Feedback Repository as the single source of truth for all product feedback, built collaboratively with Product and GTM teams:
Context inside each page:
Use case
Problem
Request
Custom Build Details (if applicable)
Integrates with:
Salesforce
Linear
Slack
Github
The 5-Step Feedback Flow
1
Intake
Customer + GTM
Feedback voiced through various sources (slack, calls, visits) and require capturing, even if addressed via custom build
2
Capture
GTM + AI Agent
Log feedback into Notion, leveraging automated routing or manual entry
3
Enrich
ProdOps + AI Agent
AI processes raw feedback auto-assign to PMs, merge duplicates, and ProdOps validates taxonomy and accuracy
4
Prioritize
Product + GTM
Review database: immediate support for "deal blockers", monthly prioritization review for others. PM updates status with rationale in "PM Notes”
5
Close Loop
PM/Eng + GTM
Eng builds and GTM notifies customers once shipped.
GTM = Solutions, AEs, CS/CX
Automation Opportunities
Enable With Automations + Human Review
Capture (Step 2)
Auto-Detect & Create Entries: AI agent monitors Slack channels, automatically detecting product feedback and creating Notion entries with initial context.
Also applicable to call transcripts if such tooling is used e.g Gong.
Slack Emoji Reactions: Team members add a specific emoji (e.g, 💡) to any message containing feedback, triggering automatic Notion entry creation.
Manual entry as fallback: Team member logs directly in Notion
Enrich (Step 3)
Auto-assignment & Notifications: AI assigns feedback to PMs based on ownership and sends immediate Slack/Notion notifications.
Duplicate Merging: Weekly AI scan identifies and merges duplicates
Manual review: ProdOps validates accuracy & fills out missing info weekly
Prioritize (Step 4)
Trend Summaries: AI generates weekly summary of top 3-5 themes per product area, helping PMs spot emerging trends and prioritize.
Linear Integration: One-click Linear issue creation from Notion via webhook
Manual review: PM refers to database as key source for quarterly planning. Updates feedback status once planning complete
Close Loop (Step 5)
Linear Integration: When issues move to "Done," feedback status in Notion auto-updates (via webhook) and submitter receives notification
Beyond the Feedback Loop
Other Forms Of Product Discovery
Monitor Active Deals
Create Salesforce reporting views of active opportunities to get closer to existing conversations.
Join Customer Calls
PM attends customer calls to hear pain points firsthand and validate product hypotheses in real-time.
Monthly Deep-Dives
Solutions, Product, and Engineering teams review 2-3 strategic deployments together. Solutions presents context and results; PM extracts product hypotheses.
Deployment Learning Repo
Structured repository for Solutions to document what was built, what worked, key learnings, and productization potential for each deployment.
Driving Internal Adoption
Rollout Strategy
1
Executive Sponsor
Get one GTM leader to champion the workflow → key for adoption
Value prop: Field learnings become product features faster, visibility into what Product has backlogged and prioritized for upcoming quarters.
2
Pilot with One GTM Team
Run 1 quarter pilot with a single team, aiming for 2-3 feedback → feature success stories
Value prop: Submission is lightweight and easy.
3
Iterate & Refine
Gather feedback from Product & GTM on the process, adjust based on learnings, and document wins
4
Scale to All GTM
Once proven and refined, extend to remaining GTM teams with clear documentation and training
Measuring Success
Key metrics:
70%+
GTM Adoption
Percentage of Solutions team members submitting at least one feedback item per month
3+
Roadmap Impact
# of quarterly roadmap projects directly driven by documented customer feedback
1-2mo
Product Velocity
Time from "field learning" to "shipped feature" reduced from 3-4 months to 1-2 months
Monitor:
Quality of feedback entry
PM/GTM satisfaction with process
Reduction in custom Solutions builds
Topic 2:
Le Chat Pricing Proposal
Overall Approach
The project will execute over 1 quarter in 5 phases, with milestones attached to each.
Be ready to adjust messaging or offer additional incentives if needed
Celebrate wins and share learnings with the team
Context: Why Re-Price Now?
Current Situation
Le Chat is priced 25% below competitors ($14.99 vs $20), positioning as value leader but potentially leaving revenue on the table
Le Chat has feature parity with $20 competitors (unlimited messages, latest models, enhanced image generation)
Growing infrastructure costs require sustainable unit economics
The Opportunity
Improve unit economics and gross margins
Maintain competitive positioning while capturing more value
Fund continued product innovation and infrastructure investment
Key Assumptions
These assumptions should be validated during Phase 1 Discovery
Mistral Positioning
Mistral positions as premium European AI solution with strong privacy emphasis
Growth Stage
Prioritize market share growth while establishing premium positioning
Competitive Context
ChatGPT Plus ($20), Claude Pro ($20), Copilot Pro ($20) as market anchors
Customer Behavior
Pro tier users are relatively price-inelastic (power users need unlimited access), Team tier has higher price sensitivity (budget approval processes), Enterprise tier buyers focus on value/ROI more than absolute price. Also, European market has 10-15% lower willingness-to-pay than US market for SaaS products (general benchmark)
Cost Structure
Assume ~$3-5 COGS per Pro user/month based on: (1) public API pricing adjusted 2-3x for internal efficiencies, (2) ChatGPT economics estimates ($5-7/user per SemiAnalysis), (3) Mistral's efficient model architecture suggests lower-end of range. Requires validation with Finance/Eng.
Target Margins
70%+ gross margin on Pro/Team, 60%+ on Enterprise (higher touch) based on industry benchmarks
Recommended Pricing Structure
TL;DR - Selective price increases with enhanced value delivery.
Free remains untouched for acquisition, Pro gets strategic 20% increase, Team gets 12% increase (both remain competitively priced while improving unit economics), Enterprise XXX
Early and clear customer communications, focusing on tier value
NEW: $5 monthly API credits (developer bridge), early access program, 24hr support SLA
Team Tier ($27.99/user)
$2+ cheaper than $30 alternatives (Claude Team, Microsoft Copilot)
European data sovereignty advantage for regulated teams
Slack/Teams integration for workflow embedding
NEW: advanced admin controls / analytics, $20/user API credits, 12hr support SLA
Enterprise Tier (Custom Pricing)
Keep "contact sales" positioning: Industry standard, preserves deal flexibility
Internal pricing framework: $40-60/user baseline with clear escalation criteria
EU data residency, domain-specific model adaptation, flexible deployment
NEW: Platform approach (bundled API access), training/customer success programs
Success Metrics
Key Metrics
Early warning system to catch issues and course-correct quickly
Day 30: If 2+ metrics in concern zone → Emergency pricing council review
Day 60: If 3+ metrics in concern zone → Consider rollback or major modifications
Day 90: Full retrospective
Appendix: Competitive Positioning
After proposed changes, Le Chat maintains pricing advantage while capturing more value
Key Insight: Le Chat remains 10% cheaper than market leaders while adding new features and improving unit economics. European data sovereignty remains a unique competitive advantage.
Appendix: Risks & Mitigation Strategy
Topic 3:
Product Launch Plan
Context
The Feature
AI Meeting Notes → a net new primitive at Notion
Key Considerations
1 of 3 key features supporting a Marketing tier 1 campaign with strict company-wide deadlines
Introduced a new space/market for Notion, requiring significant product validation and iteration
Had a predecessor feature ("Dictation") with 100s of thousands of active users - needed careful migration
Subject to new credit-based pricing system not yet tested with customers
My Role
Owned the Launch Document & Cross-Functional Alignment
Launch doc served as source of truth for all stakeholders across EPD and GTM, with feature details, timelines, relevant docs → maintained 2-3x per week with product updates, learnings, FAQs
Led daily syncs with PM, Eng leads, Design, PMM, and Data to review progress and blockers
Owned the Rollout Strategy End-to-End
Designed phased approach (Alpha → Closed Beta → Open Beta) with entry/exit criteria
Recruited and managed ~250 early testers via forms and Slack channels
Managed feature flags in Statsig, gradually increasing exposure to millions of users
Synthesized feedback weekly for Product/Eng: top requests and issues
Worked with Eng to also add a quick in-product entry point for quick feedback and documentation:
Led GTM Enablement
Hosted AMA session for Sales, CS, and CX before launch
Worked with CX to draft help center articles and design agent training
Provided PMM with customer quotes from alpha/beta for external positioning
Measuring Success
The success of this launch was measured across various metrics, each aligned to a rollout phase:
Reflections
What Went Well
Shipped on time without cutting scope or launching with known bugs
Early testing enabled critical feature adds (language support, templates) before broader release
Turned early testers into advocates - many provided testimonials for launch messaging and became case study participants
What I'd Improve
Build metrics during planning, not Alpha - flew blind first few days without dashboards
Publish "what's next" roadmap at launch - called it "Open Beta" but didn't clearly communicate upcoming features to GTM/customers
Announce pricing changes weeks in advance - surprised Beta users by switching to credits just before Open Beta
Appendix: Framework Overview
General framework I use for product launches
EPD Phase (Product & Engineering)
GTM Phase (requires at least 2 weeks notice) ⏰
EPD = Engineering, Product, Design. Also includes Product Ops and Data Science. GTM = Sales, Solutions, Customer Success, Customer Experience, Marketing. Includes sub-functions of those teams (e.g, Social).